Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemma 3 27B vs Mistral: Mistral Medium 3

Google: Gemma 3 27B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemma 3 27BMistral: Mistral Medium 3Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
131K131KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.08$0.40🏆 Google: Gemma 3 27B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.16$2.00🏆 Google: Gemma 3 27B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Mistral: Mistral Medium 3
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemma 3 27B better than Mistral: Mistral Medium 3?

Google: Gemma 3 27B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemma 3 27B and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3?

Input: $0.08 vs $0.40 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.16 vs $2.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemma 3 27B and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3 support?

Google: Gemma 3 27B supports up to 131K tokens. Mistral: Mistral Medium 3 supports up to 131K tokens.

Do both Google: Gemma 3 27B and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3 support tool calling?

Google: Gemma 3 27B: not advertised. Mistral: Mistral Medium 3: yes.

Compare Google: Gemma 3 27B with other models

Compare Mistral: Mistral Medium 3 with other models