Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemma 3 27B vs Llama Guard 3 8B

Llama Guard 3 8B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemma 3 27BLlama Guard 3 8BWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
131K131KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.08$0.02🏆 Llama Guard 3 8B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.16$0.06🏆 Llama Guard 3 8B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Tie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemma 3 27B
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemma 3 27B better than Llama Guard 3 8B?

Llama Guard 3 8B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemma 3 27B and Llama Guard 3 8B?

Input: $0.08 vs $0.02 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.16 vs $0.06 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemma 3 27B and Llama Guard 3 8B support?

Google: Gemma 3 27B supports up to 131K tokens. Llama Guard 3 8B supports up to 131K tokens.

Do both Google: Gemma 3 27B and Llama Guard 3 8B support tool calling?

Google: Gemma 3 27B: not advertised. Llama Guard 3 8B: not advertised.

Compare Google: Gemma 3 27B with other models

Compare Llama Guard 3 8B with other models