Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemma 3 27B (free) vs Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free)

Google: Gemma 3 27B (free) wins on 1 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemma 3 27B (free)Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free)Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
131K131KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.00$0.00Tie
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.00$0.00Tie
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Tie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemma 3 27B (free)
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemma 3 27B (free) better than Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free)?

Google: Gemma 3 27B (free) wins on 1 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemma 3 27B (free) and Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free)?

Input: $0.00 vs $0.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.00 vs $0.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemma 3 27B (free) and Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free) support?

Google: Gemma 3 27B (free) supports up to 131K tokens. Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free) supports up to 131K tokens.

Do both Google: Gemma 3 27B (free) and Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free) support tool calling?

Google: Gemma 3 27B (free): not advertised. Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free): not advertised.

Compare Google: Gemma 3 27B (free) with other models

Compare Meta: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free) with other models