Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemma 3 12B vs Reka Edge

Google: Gemma 3 12B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemma 3 12BReka EdgeWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
131K16K🏆 Google: Gemma 3 12B
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.05$0.10🏆 Google: Gemma 3 12B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.15$0.10🏆 Reka Edge
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemma 3 12B better than Reka Edge?

Google: Gemma 3 12B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemma 3 12B and Reka Edge?

Input: $0.05 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.15 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemma 3 12B and Reka Edge support?

Google: Gemma 3 12B supports up to 131K tokens. Reka Edge supports up to 16K tokens.

Do both Google: Gemma 3 12B and Reka Edge support tool calling?

Google: Gemma 3 12B: yes. Reka Edge: yes.

Compare Google: Gemma 3 12B with other models

Compare Reka Edge with other models