Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemma 3 12B (free) vs Meta: Llama 4 Scout

Google: Gemma 3 12B (free) and Meta: Llama 4 Scout are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemma 3 12B (free)Meta: Llama 4 ScoutWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
33K328K🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.00$0.08🏆 Google: Gemma 3 12B (free)
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.00$0.30🏆 Google: Gemma 3 12B (free)
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemma 3 12B (free) better than Meta: Llama 4 Scout?

Google: Gemma 3 12B (free) and Meta: Llama 4 Scout are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemma 3 12B (free) and Meta: Llama 4 Scout?

Input: $0.00 vs $0.08 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.00 vs $0.30 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemma 3 12B (free) and Meta: Llama 4 Scout support?

Google: Gemma 3 12B (free) supports up to 33K tokens. Meta: Llama 4 Scout supports up to 328K tokens.

Do both Google: Gemma 3 12B (free) and Meta: Llama 4 Scout support tool calling?

Google: Gemma 3 12B (free): not advertised. Meta: Llama 4 Scout: yes.

Compare Google: Gemma 3 12B (free) with other models

Compare Meta: Llama 4 Scout with other models