Model comparison · Updated 2 Nov 2026
Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) is about 1.5× cheaper on input ($1.00 against $1.50 per 1M tokens) and on output. Nano Banana 2.1 has the larger context window (66K against 4K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $1,350 a month for Nano Banana 2.1 and $630 for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613).
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)”. Retrieved 2 Nov 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/google/gemini-nano-banana-2-1/vs/openai/gpt-3-5-turbo
Model A
by Google · weights not marked open · GRIDE2
$1.50
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Nano Banana 2.1 GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) (E1) sits 1 context band smaller than Nano Banana 2.1 (E2).
Same square as Nano Banana 2.1: GPT-5.2 Chat ($1.75), Mixtral 8x22B Instruct ($2.00), Command R+ (08-2024) ($2.50). Open E2 · Open E1
View the map as a table (4 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDD1 | $0.30–1 | <32K | Gemma 2 27B |
| GRIDE1 | $1–3 | <32K | GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) |
| GRIDE2 | $1–3 | 32–128K | Nano Banana 2.1, GPT-5.2 Chat, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct, Command R+ (08-2024), GPT-4o, GPT Audio |
| GRIDE3 | $1–3 | 128–256K | Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Nano Banana 2.1 if…
- your prompts are long: it takes 65,536 tokens against 4,095
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $1.00 per 1M input against $1.50
- output dominates your bill: $2.00 per 1M output against $7.50
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Nano Banana 2.1 better than GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)?
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Nano Banana 2.1
By Google. $1.50 input and $7.50 output per 1M tokens, 66K context, atlas square E2. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
By OpenAI. $1.00 input and $2.00 output per 1M tokens, 4K context, atlas square E1. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Nano Banana 2.1 with…
- Command R+ (08-2024)$2.50
- GPT Audio$2.50
- GPT-4o$2.50
- GPT-5.2 Chat$1.75
- All alternatives →
Compare GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Nano Banana 2.1 better than GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)?
- Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?