Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.
Workload (per month)
Google: Gemini 4 Argon
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Difference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$350
$20.65
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash saves $329
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$340
$22.70
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash saves $317
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$360
$23.64
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash saves $336
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$220
$14.82
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash saves $205
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$110
$7.97
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash saves $102
Capabilities side by side
Capability
Google: Gemini 4 Argon
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
What it lets you do
Tool / function calling
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
call your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
return JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
read screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input
✓ Yes
—
accept documents without your own parsing step
Image output
—
—
generate images, not just text
Built-in web search
✓ Yes
—
answer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
repeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities
—
✓ Yes
read token confidence for classification and scoring
From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.
Price history
Google: Gemini 4 Argon: price unchanged since we started tracking it on 2026-10-14.
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: price unchanged since we started tracking it on 2026-09-23.
Which should you choose?
Choose Google: Gemini 4 Argon if…
you need file / PDF input — to accept documents without your own parsing step; Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash does not advertise it
you need built-in web search — to answer from live web results; Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash does not advertise it
Choose Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash if…
cost matters at scale — it is 94% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($20.65 vs $350 a month for 50,000 support chats)
you need log-probabilities — to read token confidence for classification and scoring; Google: Gemini 4 Argon does not advertise it
you generate long outputs in one go — up to 131K tokens (about 98,300 words) per response
Frequently asked questions
Is Google: Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Neither wins outright: Google: Gemini 4 Argon is the pick when you need file / PDF input, Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when cost matters at scale. In short: Google: Gemini 4 Argon when you need file / PDF input, you need built-in web search; Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when cost matters at scale, you need log-probabilities, you generate long outputs in one go.
Which is cheaper, Google: Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is cheaper: $0.23 vs $4.00 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 94% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $20.65 against $350.
How much do Google: Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash cost per million tokens?
Google: Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens; Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs $0.15 input and $0.47 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.
Which has the bigger context window, Google: Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Google: Gemini 4 Argon: 1.0M tokens, about 1,573 pages, against 1M (about 1,500 pages) for Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash.
Do Google: Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash support function calling and JSON output?
Gemini 4 Argon is Google's flagship reasoning model, built for complex software engineering, deep mathematical and scientific problem solving, and autonomous multi-step agents. Google trained it to keep context across...
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is an omni-modal reasoning model from Alibaba, the first Qwen model built around agentic capabilities with native audio-video understanding. It is suited for audio-video analysis and summarization,...