Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemini 3.6 FlashOpenAI: GPT-5.6 TerraWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1.0M1.1M🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$1.50$1.00🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$7.50$6.00🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash better than OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra?

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash and OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra?

Input: $1.50 vs $1.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $7.50 vs $6.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash and OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra support?

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash supports up to 1.0M tokens. OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra supports up to 1.1M tokens.

Do both Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash and OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra support tool calling?

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash: yes. OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra: yes.

Compare Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash with other models

Compare OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra with other models