Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)Z.ai: GLM 5.2Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1.0M1.0MTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.15$0.10🏆 Z.ai: GLM 5.2
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$1.25$0.31🏆 Z.ai: GLM 5.2
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) better than Z.ai: GLM 5.2?

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) and Z.ai: GLM 5.2?

Input: $0.15 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens. Output: $1.25 vs $0.31 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 support?

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) supports up to 1.0M tokens. Z.ai: GLM 5.2 supports up to 1.0M tokens.

Do both Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 support tool calling?

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch): yes. Z.ai: GLM 5.2: yes.

Compare Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) with other models

Compare Z.ai: GLM 5.2 with other models