Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Meituan: LongCat 2.0 are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteMeituan: LongCat 2.0Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1.0M1.0M🏆 Meituan: LongCat 2.0
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.25$0.30🏆 Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$1.50$1.20🏆 Meituan: LongCat 2.0
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Meituan: LongCat 2.0?

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Meituan: LongCat 2.0 are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Meituan: LongCat 2.0?

Input: $0.25 vs $0.30 per 1M tokens. Output: $1.50 vs $1.20 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Meituan: LongCat 2.0 support?

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite supports up to 1.0M tokens. Meituan: LongCat 2.0 supports up to 1.0M tokens.

Do both Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Meituan: LongCat 2.0 support tool calling?

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: yes. Meituan: LongCat 2.0: yes.

Compare Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite with other models

Compare Meituan: LongCat 2.0 with other models