Auto-generated comparison

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Reka Flash 3

Reka Flash 3 wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Reka Flash 3Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
66K66KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.25$0.10🏆 Reka Flash 3
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$1.50$0.20🏆 Reka Flash 3
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Tie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) better than Reka Flash 3?

Reka Flash 3 wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and Reka Flash 3?

Input: $0.25 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens. Output: $1.50 vs $0.20 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and Reka Flash 3 support?

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) supports up to 66K tokens. Reka Flash 3 supports up to 66K tokens.

Do both Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and Reka Flash 3 support tool calling?

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): not advertised. Reka Flash 3: not advertised.

Compare Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) with other models

Compare Reka Flash 3 with other models