Auto-generated comparison

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Auto Router (Beta)

Auto Router (Beta) wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Auto Router (Beta)Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
66K2M🏆 Auto Router (Beta)
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.25$-1000000.00🏆 Auto Router (Beta)
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$1.50$-1000000.00🏆 Auto Router (Beta)
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Auto Router (Beta)
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) better than Auto Router (Beta)?

Auto Router (Beta) wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and Auto Router (Beta)?

Input: $0.25 vs $-1000000.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $1.50 vs $-1000000.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and Auto Router (Beta) support?

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) supports up to 66K tokens. Auto Router (Beta) supports up to 2M tokens.

Do both Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and Auto Router (Beta) support tool calling?

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): not advertised. Auto Router (Beta): yes.

Compare Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) with other models

Compare Auto Router (Beta) with other models