Auto-generated comparison

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs OpenAI: GPT-5 Image

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)OpenAI: GPT-5 ImageWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
131K400K🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5 Image
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.50$10.00🏆 Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$3.00$10.00🏆 Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Tie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) better than OpenAI: GPT-5 Image?

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and OpenAI: GPT-5 Image?

Input: $0.50 vs $10.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $3.00 vs $10.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and OpenAI: GPT-5 Image support?

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) supports up to 131K tokens. OpenAI: GPT-5 Image supports up to 400K tokens.

Do both Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and OpenAI: GPT-5 Image support tool calling?

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): not advertised. OpenAI: GPT-5 Image: not advertised.

Compare Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) with other models

Compare OpenAI: GPT-5 Image with other models