Model comparison · Updated 17 Aug 2026
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.40 against $0.50 per 1M tokens) and on output. Both have a 131K-token context window. For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $495 a month for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and $216 for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct”. Retrieved 17 Aug 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/google/gemini-3-1-flash-image/vs/meta/llama-3-1-70b-instruct
Model A
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
by Google · weights not marked open · GRIDD3
$0.50
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) Llama 3.1 70B Instruct · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
Same square. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct share D3.
Same square as Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): Codestral 2508 ($0.30), Command A+ ($0.30), MiniMax M2 ($0.30). Open D3
View the map as a table (1 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDD3 | $0.30–1 | 128–256K | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image), Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, Mistral Medium 3, Mistral Medium 3.1, R1 0528, DeepSeek V3, Command A+, Muse Glimmer 30B |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) over Llama 3.1 70B Instruct. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Google.
Choose Llama 3.1 70B Instruct if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.40 per 1M input against $0.50
- output dominates your bill: $0.40 per 1M output against $3.00
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) better than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
By Google. $0.50 input and $3.00 output per 1M tokens, 131K context, atlas square D3. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
By Meta. $0.40 input and $0.40 output per 1M tokens, 131K context, atlas square D3. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) with…
- Mistral Medium 3$0.40
- Mistral Medium 3.1$0.40
- R1 0528$0.70
- DeepSeek V3$0.32
- All alternatives →
Compare Llama 3.1 70B Instruct with…
- Codestral 2508$0.30
- Command A+$0.30
- DeepSeek V3$0.32
- Devstral 2 2512$0.40
- All alternatives →
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) better than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
- Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?