Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) vs Particle AI: Particle-1

Neither wins outright: Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) is the pick when you need audio input, Particle AI: Particle-1 when you need log-probabilities.

Key numbers

SpecGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch)Particle AI: Particle-1
ProviderGoogleParticle Ai
Input price (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.25
Output price (per 1M tokens)$1.25$1.00
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$0.42$0.44
Cheaper than … of all models we track57%56%
Context window1.0M tokens (~1,573 pages)1.0M tokens (~1,573 pages)
Larger context than … of all models80%80%
Max output per response66K tokens (~49,200 words)131K tokens (~98,300 words)
Input typesfile, image, text, audio, videotext, image
Output typestexttext
Free variantNoNo
Listed since2025-06-172026-10-28
Advertisement

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch)Particle AI: Particle-1Difference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$36.25$38.75Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) saves $2.50
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$30.50$40.00Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) saves $9.50
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$33.00$42.00Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) saves $9.00
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$19.50$26.00Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) saves $6.50
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$8.75$13.50Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) saves $4.75

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch)Particle AI: Particle-1What it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes✓ Yescall your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes✓ Yesreturn JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode✓ Yes✓ Yesspend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input✓ Yes✓ Yesread screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input✓ Yes—take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input✓ Yes—accept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search✓ Yes—answer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)✓ Yes✓ Yesrepeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities—✓ Yesread token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

Which should you choose?

Choose Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) if…

  • you need audio input — to take speech or audio directly; Particle AI: Particle-1 does not advertise it
  • you need file / PDF input — to accept documents without your own parsing step; Particle AI: Particle-1 does not advertise it
  • you need built-in web search — to answer from live web results; Particle AI: Particle-1 does not advertise it

Choose Particle AI: Particle-1 if…

  • you need log-probabilities — to read token confidence for classification and scoring; Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) does not advertise it
  • you generate long outputs in one go — up to 131K tokens (about 98,300 words) per response
  • you want the newer model — released 2026-10-28, 17 months after the other

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) better than Particle AI: Particle-1?

Neither wins outright: Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) is the pick when you need audio input, Particle AI: Particle-1 when you need log-probabilities. In short: Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) when you need audio input, you need file / PDF input, you need built-in web search; Particle AI: Particle-1 when you need log-probabilities, you generate long outputs in one go, you want the newer model.

Which is cheaper, Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) or Particle AI: Particle-1?

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) is cheaper: $0.42 vs $0.44 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 3% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $36.25 against $38.75.

How much do Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) and Particle AI: Particle-1 cost per million tokens?

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) costs $0.15 per 1M input tokens and $1.25 per 1M output tokens; Particle AI: Particle-1 costs $0.25 input and $1.00 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) or Particle AI: Particle-1?

Both take 1.0M tokens per request — roughly 1,573 pages of text.

Do Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) and Particle AI: Particle-1 support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch): yes, Particle AI: Particle-1: yes. JSON-schema structured output — Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch): yes, Particle AI: Particle-1: yes.

Can Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) or Particle AI: Particle-1 read images?

Yes, both accept image input.

Is Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) or Particle AI: Particle-1 free to use?

No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.

What is the maximum output length of Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) and Particle AI: Particle-1?

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) can write up to 66K tokens (about 49,200 words) per response; Particle AI: Particle-1 up to 131K (about 98,300 words).

When were Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) and Particle AI: Particle-1 released?

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) was listed on 2025-06-17; Particle AI: Particle-1 on 2026-10-28.

About the two models

Compare Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) with other models

Compare Particle AI: Particle-1 with other models

Advertisement