Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) vs Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch)Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1.0M131K🏆 Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch)
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.15$0.40🏆 Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch)
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$1.25$2.00🏆 Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch)
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch)

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) better than Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1?

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1?

Input: $0.15 vs $0.40 per 1M tokens. Output: $1.25 vs $2.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1 support?

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) supports up to 1.0M tokens. Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1 supports up to 131K tokens.

Do both Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1 support tool calling?

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch): yes. Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1: yes.

Compare Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash (batch) with other models

Compare Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1 with other models