Gemini Flash 2.0 offers a significantly faster time to first token (TTFT) compared to [Gemini Flash 1.5](/google/gemini-flash-1.5), while maintaining quality on par with larger models like [Gemini Pro 1.5](/google/gemini-pro-1.5). It introd…
Model details →Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (16E) is a mixture-of-experts (MoE) language model developed by Meta, activating 17 billion parameters out of a total of 109B. It supports native multimodal input...
Model details →Side-by-side comparison
| Capability | Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash | Meta: Llama 4 Scout | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request. | 1.0M | 1.3M | 🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout |
| Input price (per 1M) Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider. | $0.10 | $0.10 | Tie |
| Output price (per 1M) Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider. | $0.40 | $0.30 | 🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout |
| Tool / function calling First-class support for emitting structured tool calls. | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Vision input Accepts image inputs alongside text. | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Reasoning mode Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support. | — | — | Tie |
Frequently asked questions
Is Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash better than Meta: Llama 4 Scout?
Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.
What's the price difference between Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash and Meta: Llama 4 Scout?
Input: $0.10 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.40 vs $0.30 per 1M tokens.
What context windows do Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash and Meta: Llama 4 Scout support?
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash supports up to 1.0M tokens. Meta: Llama 4 Scout supports up to 1.3M tokens.
Do both Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash and Meta: Llama 4 Scout support tool calling?
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash: yes. Meta: Llama 4 Scout: yes.