Model comparison · Updated 2 Nov 2026
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nemotron 3 Super
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is about 1.7× cheaper on input ($0.05 against $0.09 per 1M tokens) and on output. Both have a 1.05M-token context window. For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $39.78 a month for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and $74.25 for Nemotron 3 Super.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nemotron 3 Super”. Retrieved 2 Nov 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/deepseek/v4-1/vs/nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b
Model A
by DeepSeek · weights not marked open · GRIDB5
$0.05
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 2 Nov 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Nemotron 3 Super · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
Same square. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Nemotron 3 Super share B5.
Same square as DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: Qwen3.7 Flash ($0.03), Qwen3.5-Flash ($0.07), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) ($0.07). Open B5
View the map as a table (2 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDB4 | <$0.10 | 256K–1M | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 |
| GRIDB5 | <$0.10 | 1M | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, Nemotron 3 Super, Qwen3.5-Flash, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free), Qwen3.7 Flash, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.05 per 1M input against $0.09
- output dominates your bill: $0.19 per 1M output against $0.40
- work can wait: it lists a batch tier and the other does not
Choose Nemotron 3 Super if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Nemotron 3 Super over DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with NVIDIA.
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Nemotron 3 Super?
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Nemotron 3 Super?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
By DeepSeek. $0.05 input and $0.19 output per 1M tokens, 1.05M context, atlas square B5. Tiers listed: batch, standard.
Full specs & pricing →Nemotron 3 Super
By NVIDIA. $0.09 input and $0.40 output per 1M tokens, 1.05M context, atlas square B5. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 with…
Compare Nemotron 3 Super with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Nemotron 3 Super?
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Nemotron 3 Super?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?