Auto-generated comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Microsoft: Phi 4

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMicrosoft: Phi 4Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
164K16K🏆 DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.21$0.07🏆 Microsoft: Phi 4
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.79$0.14🏆 Microsoft: Phi 4
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Tie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than Microsoft: Phi 4?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Microsoft: Phi 4?

Input: $0.21 vs $0.07 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.79 vs $0.14 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Microsoft: Phi 4 support?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus supports up to 164K tokens. Microsoft: Phi 4 supports up to 16K tokens.

Do both DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Microsoft: Phi 4 support tool calling?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: yes. Microsoft: Phi 4: not advertised.

Compare DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus with other models

Compare Microsoft: Phi 4 with other models