Auto-generated comparison

DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Reka: Flash 3

Reka: Flash 3 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityDeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32BReka: Flash 3Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
33K66K🏆 Reka: Flash 3
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.29$0.10🏆 Reka: Flash 3
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.29$0.20🏆 Reka: Flash 3
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Tie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Tie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B better than Reka: Flash 3?

Reka: Flash 3 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Reka: Flash 3?

Input: $0.29 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.29 vs $0.20 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Reka: Flash 3 support?

DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports up to 33K tokens. Reka: Flash 3 supports up to 66K tokens.

Do both DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Reka: Flash 3 support tool calling?

DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B: not advertised. Reka: Flash 3: not advertised.

Compare DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B with other models

Compare Reka: Flash 3 with other models