Auto-generated comparison

DeepSeek: R1 0528 vs Z.ai: GLM 4 32B

DeepSeek: R1 0528 and Z.ai: GLM 4 32B are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityDeepSeek: R1 0528Z.ai: GLM 4 32BWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
164K128K🏆 DeepSeek: R1 0528
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.45$0.10🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4 32B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$2.15$0.10🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4 32B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Tie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 DeepSeek: R1 0528

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek: R1 0528 better than Z.ai: GLM 4 32B?

DeepSeek: R1 0528 and Z.ai: GLM 4 32B are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

What's the price difference between DeepSeek: R1 0528 and Z.ai: GLM 4 32B?

Input: $0.45 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens. Output: $2.15 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do DeepSeek: R1 0528 and Z.ai: GLM 4 32B support?

DeepSeek: R1 0528 supports up to 164K tokens. Z.ai: GLM 4 32B supports up to 128K tokens.

Do both DeepSeek: R1 0528 and Z.ai: GLM 4 32B support tool calling?

DeepSeek: R1 0528: yes. Z.ai: GLM 4 32B: yes.

Compare DeepSeek: R1 0528 with other models

Compare Z.ai: GLM 4 32B with other models