Auto-generated comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air

Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1Z.ai: GLM 4.5 AirWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
164K131K🏆 DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.25$0.13🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.95$0.85🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Tie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 better than Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air?

Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 and Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air?

Input: $0.25 vs $0.13 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.95 vs $0.85 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 and Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air support?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 supports up to 164K tokens. Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air supports up to 131K tokens.

Do both DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 and Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air support tool calling?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1: yes. Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air: yes.

Compare DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 with other models

Compare Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air with other models