Auto-generated comparison

Cohere: Command A vs Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 wins on 6 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityCohere: Command AMistral: Mistral Medium 3.5Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
256K262K🏆 Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$2.50$1.50🏆 Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$10.00$7.50🏆 Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5

Frequently asked questions

Is Cohere: Command A better than Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 wins on 6 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Cohere: Command A and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5?

Input: $2.50 vs $1.50 per 1M tokens. Output: $10.00 vs $7.50 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Cohere: Command A and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 support?

Cohere: Command A supports up to 256K tokens. Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 supports up to 262K tokens.

Do both Cohere: Command A and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 support tool calling?

Cohere: Command A: not advertised. Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5: yes.

Compare Cohere: Command A with other models

Compare Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 with other models