Auto-generated comparison

Cohere: Command A vs Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct

Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityCohere: Command AMeta: Llama 3 70B InstructWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
256K8K🏆 Cohere: Command A
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$2.50$0.51🏆 Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$10.00$0.74🏆 Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Tie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Tie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Cohere: Command A better than Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct?

Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Cohere: Command A and Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct?

Input: $2.50 vs $0.51 per 1M tokens. Output: $10.00 vs $0.74 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Cohere: Command A and Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct support?

Cohere: Command A supports up to 256K tokens. Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct supports up to 8K tokens.

Do both Cohere: Command A and Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct support tool calling?

Cohere: Command A: not advertised. Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct: not advertised.

Compare Cohere: Command A with other models

Compare Meta: Llama 3 70B Instruct with other models