Auto-generated comparison

ByteDance: UI-TARS 7B vs Cohere: Command A+

Cohere: Command A+ wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityByteDance: UI-TARS 7BCohere: Command A+Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
128K192K🏆 Cohere: Command A+
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.10$0.30🏆 ByteDance: UI-TARS 7B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.20$1.50🏆 ByteDance: UI-TARS 7B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Cohere: Command A+
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Cohere: Command A+

Frequently asked questions

Is ByteDance: UI-TARS 7B better than Cohere: Command A+?

Cohere: Command A+ wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between ByteDance: UI-TARS 7B and Cohere: Command A+?

Input: $0.10 vs $0.30 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.20 vs $1.50 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do ByteDance: UI-TARS 7B and Cohere: Command A+ support?

ByteDance: UI-TARS 7B supports up to 128K tokens. Cohere: Command A+ supports up to 192K tokens.

Do both ByteDance: UI-TARS 7B and Cohere: Command A+ support tool calling?

ByteDance: UI-TARS 7B: not advertised. Cohere: Command A+: yes.

Compare ByteDance: UI-TARS 7B with other models

Compare Cohere: Command A+ with other models