Auto-generated comparison

ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto)

ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto)Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K205K🏆 ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.25$0.44🏆 ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$2.00$1.76🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto)
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 better than Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto)?

ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 and Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto)?

Input: $0.25 vs $0.44 per 1M tokens. Output: $2.00 vs $1.76 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 and Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto) support?

ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 supports up to 262K tokens. Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto) supports up to 205K tokens.

Do both ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 and Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto) support tool calling?

ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6: yes. Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto): yes.

Compare ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 with other models

Compare Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto) with other models