Auto-generated comparison

ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 vs Meta: Llama 4 Scout

Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6Meta: Llama 4 ScoutWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K328K🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.25$0.08🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$2.00$0.30🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6

Frequently asked questions

Is ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 better than Meta: Llama 4 Scout?

Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 and Meta: Llama 4 Scout?

Input: $0.25 vs $0.08 per 1M tokens. Output: $2.00 vs $0.30 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 and Meta: Llama 4 Scout support?

ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 supports up to 262K tokens. Meta: Llama 4 Scout supports up to 328K tokens.

Do both ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 and Meta: Llama 4 Scout support tool calling?

ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6: yes. Meta: Llama 4 Scout: yes.

Compare ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 with other models

Compare Meta: Llama 4 Scout with other models