Auto-generated comparison

ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 Flash vs Meta: Llama 4 Scout

ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 Flash wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 FlashMeta: Llama 4 ScoutWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K328K🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.07$0.08🏆 ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 Flash
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.30$0.30Tie
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 Flash

Frequently asked questions

Is ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 Flash better than Meta: Llama 4 Scout?

ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 Flash wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 Flash and Meta: Llama 4 Scout?

Input: $0.07 vs $0.08 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.30 vs $0.30 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 Flash and Meta: Llama 4 Scout support?

ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 Flash supports up to 262K tokens. Meta: Llama 4 Scout supports up to 328K tokens.

Do both ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 Flash and Meta: Llama 4 Scout support tool calling?

ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 Flash: yes. Meta: Llama 4 Scout: yes.

Compare ByteDance Seed: Seed 1.6 Flash with other models

Compare Meta: Llama 4 Scout with other models