Auto-generated comparison

Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityBaidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47BGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
123K1.0M🏆 Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.42$0.13🏆 Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$1.25$0.75🏆 Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B better than Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)?

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B and Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)?

Input: $0.42 vs $0.13 per 1M tokens. Output: $1.25 vs $0.75 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B and Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) support?

Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B supports up to 123K tokens. Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) supports up to 1.0M tokens.

Do both Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B and Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) support tool calling?

Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B: not advertised. Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch): yes.

Compare Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B with other models

Compare Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) with other models