Auto-generated comparison

Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B vs Google: Gemma 2 9B

Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityBaidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3BGoogle: Gemma 2 9BWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
30K8K🏆 Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.14$0.03🏆 Google: Gemma 2 9B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.56$0.09🏆 Google: Gemma 2 9B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B

Frequently asked questions

Is Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B better than Google: Gemma 2 9B?

Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B and Google: Gemma 2 9B?

Input: $0.14 vs $0.03 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.56 vs $0.09 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B and Google: Gemma 2 9B support?

Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B supports up to 30K tokens. Google: Gemma 2 9B supports up to 8K tokens.

Do both Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B and Google: Gemma 2 9B support tool calling?

Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B: yes. Google: Gemma 2 9B: not advertised.

Compare Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B with other models

Compare Google: Gemma 2 9B with other models