Auto-generated comparison

Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Google: Gemma 3n 4B

Google: Gemma 3n 4B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityBaidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BGoogle: Gemma 3n 4BWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
123K33K🏆 Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.28$0.06🏆 Google: Gemma 3n 4B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$1.10$0.12🏆 Google: Gemma 3n 4B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Tie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Tie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B better than Google: Gemma 3n 4B?

Google: Gemma 3n 4B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Google: Gemma 3n 4B?

Input: $0.28 vs $0.06 per 1M tokens. Output: $1.10 vs $0.12 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Google: Gemma 3n 4B support?

Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B supports up to 123K tokens. Google: Gemma 3n 4B supports up to 33K tokens.

Do both Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Google: Gemma 3n 4B support tool calling?

Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B: not advertised. Google: Gemma 3n 4B: not advertised.

Compare Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B with other models

Compare Google: Gemma 3n 4B with other models