Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.5V

Z.ai: GLM 4.5V wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5Z.ai: GLM 4.5VWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M66K🏆 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$2.00$0.60🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.5V
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$10.00$1.80🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.5V
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 better than Z.ai: GLM 4.5V?

Z.ai: GLM 4.5V wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 and Z.ai: GLM 4.5V?

Input: $2.00 vs $0.60 per 1M tokens. Output: $10.00 vs $1.80 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 and Z.ai: GLM 4.5V support?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 supports up to 1M tokens. Z.ai: GLM 4.5V supports up to 66K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 and Z.ai: GLM 4.5V support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5: yes. Z.ai: GLM 4.5V: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 with other models

Compare Z.ai: GLM 4.5V with other models