Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra comes out ahead on the data we track: 2 advantages and none for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5.

Key numbers

SpecAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$1.00
Output price (per 1M tokens)$10.00$5.00
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$4.00$2.00
Cheaper than … of all models we track15%25%
Context window1M tokens (~1,500 pages)1.1M tokens (~1,575 pages)
Larger context than … of all models68%92%
Max output per response128K tokens (~96,000 words)128K tokens (~96,000 words)
Input typestext, image, filefile, image, text
Output typestexttext
Free variantNoNo
Listed since2026-09-282026-10-26
Advertisement

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5OpenAI: GPT-6.1 TerraDifference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$350$175OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra saves $175
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$340$170OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra saves $170
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$360$180OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra saves $180
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$220$110OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra saves $110
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$110$55.00OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra saves $55.00

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5OpenAI: GPT-6.1 TerraWhat it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes✓ Yescall your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes✓ Yesreturn JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode✓ Yes✓ Yesspend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input✓ Yes✓ Yesread screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input——take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input✓ Yes✓ Yesaccept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search✓ Yes✓ Yesanswer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)—✓ Yesrepeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities——read token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

Which should you choose?

Choose Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 if…

No advantage on the data we track — pick it for provider preference or output quality on your own prompts.

Choose OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 50% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($175 vs $350 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you need seed (reproducible sampling) — to repeat a generation for tests and evals; Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 does not advertise it

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra?

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra comes out ahead on the data we track: 2 advantages and none for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5.

Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 or OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra?

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra is cheaper: $2.00 vs $4.00 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 50% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $175 against $350.

How much do Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 and OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra cost per million tokens?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens; OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra costs $1.00 input and $5.00 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 or OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra?

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra: 1.1M tokens, about 1,575 pages, against 1M (about 1,500 pages) for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5.

Do Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 and OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5: yes, OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra: yes. JSON-schema structured output — Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5: yes, OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra: yes.

Can Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 or OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra read images?

Yes, both accept image input.

Is Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 or OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra free to use?

No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.

What is the maximum output length of Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 and OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 can write up to 128K tokens (about 96,000 words) per response; OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra up to 128K (about 96,000 words).

When were Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 and OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra released?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 was listed on 2026-09-28; OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra on 2026-10-26.

About the two models

Compare Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 with other models

Compare OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra with other models

Advertisement