Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)Google: Gemini 3.5 FlashWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M1.0M🏆 Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$1.00$1.50🏆 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$5.00$9.00🏆 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) better than Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) and Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Input: $1.00 vs $1.50 per 1M tokens. Output: $5.00 vs $9.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) and Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash support?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) supports up to 1M tokens. Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash supports up to 1.0M tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) and Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch): yes. Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) with other models

Compare Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash with other models