Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs OpenAI: o1

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6OpenAI: o1Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M200K🏆 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$3.00$15.00🏆 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$15.00$60.00🏆 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than OpenAI: o1?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 and OpenAI: o1?

Input: $3.00 vs $15.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $15.00 vs $60.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 and OpenAI: o1 support?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports up to 1M tokens. OpenAI: o1 supports up to 200K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 and OpenAI: o1 support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6: yes. OpenAI: o1: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 with other models

Compare OpenAI: o1 with other models