Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M1MTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$3.00$0.26🏆 Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$15.00$1.56🏆 Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

Input: $3.00 vs $0.26 per 1M tokens. Output: $15.00 vs $1.56 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 support?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports up to 1M tokens. Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 supports up to 1M tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5: yes. Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 with other models

Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 with other models