Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen VL Max

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen VL Max are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5Qwen: Qwen VL MaxWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M131K🏆 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$3.00$0.52🏆 Qwen: Qwen VL Max
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$15.00$2.08🏆 Qwen: Qwen VL Max
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Qwen: Qwen VL Max?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen VL Max are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen VL Max?

Input: $3.00 vs $0.52 per 1M tokens. Output: $15.00 vs $2.08 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen VL Max support?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports up to 1M tokens. Qwen: Qwen VL Max supports up to 131K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen VL Max support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5: yes. Qwen: Qwen VL Max: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 with other models

Compare Qwen: Qwen VL Max with other models