Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M1.0M🏆 Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$3.00$0.75🏆 Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$15.00$3.75🏆 Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)?

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)?

Input: $3.00 vs $0.75 per 1M tokens. Output: $15.00 vs $3.75 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) support?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports up to 1M tokens. Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) supports up to 1.0M tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5: yes. Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch): yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 with other models

Compare Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) with other models