Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime wins on 1 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Opus 5.5Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max PrimeWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M1MTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$4.00$4.00Tie
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$20.00$12.00🏆 Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 better than Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime?

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime wins on 1 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime?

Input: $4.00 vs $4.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $20.00 vs $12.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime support?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 supports up to 1M tokens. Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime supports up to 1M tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5: yes. Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 with other models

Compare Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime with other models