Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K3

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Opus 5.5MoonshotAI: Kimi K3Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M1.0M🏆 MoonshotAI: Kimi K3
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$4.00$3.00🏆 MoonshotAI: Kimi K3
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$20.00$15.00🏆 MoonshotAI: Kimi K3
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 better than MoonshotAI: Kimi K3?

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 and MoonshotAI: Kimi K3?

Input: $4.00 vs $3.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $20.00 vs $15.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 and MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 support?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 supports up to 1M tokens. MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 supports up to 1.0M tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 and MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5: yes. MoonshotAI: Kimi K3: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 with other models

Compare MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 with other models