Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Neither wins outright: Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) is the pick when you need image input, Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B when cost matters at scale.

Key numbers

SpecAnthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderAnthropicReflection
Input price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$1.00
Output price (per 1M tokens)$10.00$3.00
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$4.00$1.50
Cheaper than … of all models we track15%31%
Context window1M tokens (~1,500 pages)1.0M tokens (~1,573 pages)
Larger context than … of all models69%81%
Max output per response128K tokens (~96,000 words)944K tokens (~707,800 words)
Input typestext, image, filetext
Output typestexttext
Free variantNoNo
Listed since2026-09-222026-10-16

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23BDifference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$350$135Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B saves $215
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$340$150Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B saves $190
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$360$156Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B saves $204
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$220$98.00Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B saves $122
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$110$53.00Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B saves $57.00

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23BWhat it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes✓ Yescall your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes✓ Yesreturn JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode✓ Yes✓ Yesspend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input✓ Yes—read screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input——take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input✓ Yes—accept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search✓ Yes—answer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)—✓ Yesrepeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities—✓ Yesread token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

Which should you choose?

Choose Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) if…

  • you need image input — to read screenshots, charts and scanned pages; Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B does not advertise it
  • you need file / PDF input — to accept documents without your own parsing step; Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B does not advertise it
  • you need built-in web search — to answer from live web results; Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B does not advertise it

Choose Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 63% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($135 vs $350 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you need seed (reproducible sampling) — to repeat a generation for tests and evals; Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) does not advertise it
  • you need log-probabilities — to read token confidence for classification and scoring; Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) does not advertise it
  • you generate long outputs in one go — up to 944K tokens (about 707,800 words) per response

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) better than Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Neither wins outright: Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) is the pick when you need image input, Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B when cost matters at scale. In short: Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) when you need image input, you need file / PDF input, you need built-in web search; Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B when cost matters at scale, you need seed (reproducible sampling), you need log-probabilities, you generate long outputs in one go.

Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) or Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $1.50 vs $4.00 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 63% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $135 against $350.

How much do Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) and Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B cost per million tokens?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens; Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $1.00 input and $3.00 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) or Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1.0M tokens, about 1,573 pages, against 1M (about 1,500 pages) for Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch).

Do Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) and Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch): yes, Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B: yes. JSON-schema structured output — Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch): yes, Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B: yes.

Can Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) or Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B read images?

Only Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) accepts image input; Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B is text-only for input.

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) or Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B free to use?

No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.

What is the maximum output length of Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) and Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) can write up to 128K tokens (about 96,000 words) per response; Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B up to 944K (about 707,800 words).

When were Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) and Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B released?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) was listed on 2026-09-22; Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B on 2026-10-16.

About the two models

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) with other models

Compare Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B with other models

Advertisement