Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)

Neither wins outright: Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) is the pick when you need image input, Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) when cost matters at scale.

Key numbers

SpecAnthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)
ProviderAnthropicQwen
Input price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$2.00
Output price (per 1M tokens)$10.00$6.00
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$4.00$3.00
Cheaper than … of all models we track15%21%
Context window1M tokens (~1,500 pages)1.0M tokens (~1,515 pages)
Larger context than … of all models69%79%
Max output per response128K tokens (~96,000 words)909K tokens (~681,800 words)
Input typestext, image, filetext
Output typestexttext
Free variantNoNo
Listed since2026-09-222026-08-12
Advertisement

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)Difference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$350$270Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) saves $80.00
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$340$300Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) saves $40.00
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$360$312Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) saves $48.00
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$220$196Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) saves $24.00
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$110$106Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) saves $4.00

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)What it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes✓ Yescall your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes✓ Yesreturn JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode✓ Yes✓ Yesspend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input✓ Yes—read screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input——take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input✓ Yes—accept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search✓ Yes—answer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)——repeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities—✓ Yesread token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

DateModelInput / 1MOutput / 1M
2026-09-02Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)$2.00$6.00

Which should you choose?

Choose Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) if…

  • you need image input — to read screenshots, charts and scanned pages; Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) does not advertise it
  • you need file / PDF input — to accept documents without your own parsing step; Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) does not advertise it
  • you need built-in web search — to answer from live web results; Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) does not advertise it

Choose Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 25% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($270 vs $350 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you need log-probabilities — to read token confidence for classification and scoring; Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) does not advertise it
  • you generate long outputs in one go — up to 909K tokens (about 681,800 words) per response

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) better than Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)?

Neither wins outright: Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) is the pick when you need image input, Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) when cost matters at scale. In short: Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) when you need image input, you need file / PDF input, you need built-in web search; Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) when cost matters at scale, you need log-probabilities, you generate long outputs in one go.

Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)?

Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) is cheaper: $3.00 vs $4.00 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 25% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $270 against $350.

How much do Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) and Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) cost per million tokens?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens; Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) costs $2.00 input and $6.00 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)?

Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch): 1.0M tokens, about 1,515 pages, against 1M (about 1,500 pages) for Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch).

Do Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) and Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch): yes, Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch): yes. JSON-schema structured output — Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch): yes, Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch): yes.

Can Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) read images?

Only Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) accepts image input; Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) is text-only for input.

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) free to use?

No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.

What is the maximum output length of Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) and Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) can write up to 128K tokens (about 96,000 words) per response; Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) up to 909K (about 681,800 words).

When were Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) and Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) released?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) was listed on 2026-09-22; Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) on 2026-08-12.

Has the price of Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) changed?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch): price unchanged since we started tracking it on 2026-09-23. Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch): input price cut 20% ($2.50 → $2.00/1M), output price cut 4% ($6.25 → $6.00/1M) on 2026-09-02.

About the two models

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) with other models

Compare Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) with other models

Advertisement