Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) vs Sakana: Fugu Ultra

Sakana: Fugu Ultra wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast)Sakana: Fugu UltraWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M1MTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$10.00$5.00🏆 Sakana: Fugu Ultra
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$50.00$30.00🏆 Sakana: Fugu Ultra
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) better than Sakana: Fugu Ultra?

Sakana: Fugu Ultra wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) and Sakana: Fugu Ultra?

Input: $10.00 vs $5.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $50.00 vs $30.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) and Sakana: Fugu Ultra support?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) supports up to 1M tokens. Sakana: Fugu Ultra supports up to 1M tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) and Sakana: Fugu Ultra support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast): yes. Sakana: Fugu Ultra: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) with other models

Compare Sakana: Fugu Ultra with other models