Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast)OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna ProWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M1.1M🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$10.00$0.10🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$50.00$0.60🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) better than OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro?

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) and OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro?

Input: $10.00 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens. Output: $50.00 vs $0.60 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) and OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro support?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) supports up to 1M tokens. OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro supports up to 1.1M tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) and OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast): yes. OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) with other models

Compare OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro with other models