Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Sakana: Fugu Ultra

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 wins on 1 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.7Sakana: Fugu UltraWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M1MTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$5.00$5.00Tie
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$25.00$30.00🏆 Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 better than Sakana: Fugu Ultra?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 wins on 1 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 and Sakana: Fugu Ultra?

Input: $5.00 vs $5.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $25.00 vs $30.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 and Sakana: Fugu Ultra support?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 supports up to 1M tokens. Sakana: Fugu Ultra supports up to 1M tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 and Sakana: Fugu Ultra support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7: yes. Sakana: Fugu Ultra: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 with other models

Compare Sakana: Fugu Ultra with other models