Auto-generated comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins on 5 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityClaude Opus 4.7Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M1.0M🏆 Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
Custom$2.00🏆 Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
Custom$12.00🏆 Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins on 5 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Claude Opus 4.7 and Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Input: Custom vs $2.00 per 1M tokens. Output: Custom vs $12.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Claude Opus 4.7 and Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview support?

Claude Opus 4.7 supports up to 1M tokens. Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview supports up to 1.0M tokens.

Do both Claude Opus 4.7 and Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview support tool calling?

Claude Opus 4.7: not advertised. Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: yes.

Compare Claude Opus 4.7 with other models

Compare Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview with other models