Auto-generated comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash wins on 5 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityClaude Opus 4.7Google: Gemini 2.5 FlashWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M1.0M🏆 Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
Custom$0.30🏆 Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
Custom$2.50🏆 Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash wins on 5 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Claude Opus 4.7 and Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Input: Custom vs $0.30 per 1M tokens. Output: Custom vs $2.50 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Claude Opus 4.7 and Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash support?

Claude Opus 4.7 supports up to 1M tokens. Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash supports up to 1.0M tokens.

Do both Claude Opus 4.7 and Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash support tool calling?

Claude Opus 4.7: not advertised. Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash: yes.

Compare Claude Opus 4.7 with other models

Compare Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash with other models