Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast)OpenAI: GPT-5.6 SolWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M1.1M🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$30.00$5.00🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$150.00$30.00🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) better than OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol?

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) and OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol?

Input: $30.00 vs $5.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $150.00 vs $30.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) and OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol support?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) supports up to 1M tokens. OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol supports up to 1.1M tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) and OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast): yes. OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) with other models

Compare OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol with other models