Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs xAI: Grok 4 Fast

xAI: Grok 4 Fast wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.6xAI: Grok 4 FastWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M2M🏆 xAI: Grok 4 Fast
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$5.00$0.20🏆 xAI: Grok 4 Fast
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$25.00$0.50🏆 xAI: Grok 4 Fast
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 better than xAI: Grok 4 Fast?

xAI: Grok 4 Fast wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 and xAI: Grok 4 Fast?

Input: $5.00 vs $0.20 per 1M tokens. Output: $25.00 vs $0.50 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 and xAI: Grok 4 Fast support?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 supports up to 1M tokens. xAI: Grok 4 Fast supports up to 2M tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 and xAI: Grok 4 Fast support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6: yes. xAI: Grok 4 Fast: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 with other models

Compare xAI: Grok 4 Fast with other models