Auto-generated comparison

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano

OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.6OpenAI: GPT-5 NanoWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M400K🏆 Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$5.00$0.05🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$25.00$0.40🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 better than OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano?

OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 and OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano?

Input: $5.00 vs $0.05 per 1M tokens. Output: $25.00 vs $0.40 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 and OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano support?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 supports up to 1M tokens. OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano supports up to 400K tokens.

Do both Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 and OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano support tool calling?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6: yes. OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano: yes.

Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 with other models

Compare OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano with other models